Hello There, Guest!  LoginRegister

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
You are in charge of the next Pokemon Video Game
Author Message
BumblebeeCody Offline
Super Moderator
******

Posts: 2,194
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 24
Thanks: 1796
Given 339 thank(s) in 266 post(s)
Post: #30
RE: You are in charge of the next Pokemon Video Game
(11-17-2012 01:18 AM)Arjahn Wrote:  
(11-13-2012 02:29 AM)BumblebeeCody Wrote:  Another one to add.
I would take away HMs. They don't need to be in Pokemon anymore. I don't know a single person who likes HMs. Nothing worse than making your way to a cave to find out you need a frikkin' Zubat to flash the area. Then getting further into the cave to realise you need to bring a Scraggy to use strength. We don't need that shi- anymore it's stupid and annoying. Keep the moves in the game but don't add exploration sections around those moves anymore. Sad

But... but... you can cut down small trees! whispers into ear small..trees.. licks ear

Made me flinch and shiver reading that.

I agree with TheRealJDawgz and retrolinkx said. If HMs are in the game, at least make them useful in battle. Otherwise get rid of them. Flash is easily the worst HM and strength is if the most tedious annoying "progression-blocker" there is. Surf is good for exploring water so that can stay. Waterfall is pointless and not needed. Cut is pointless and useless. Fly is good outside of battle and Rock Smash is a crap move in and outside of battle.
(This post was last modified: 11-18-2012 02:27 AM by BumblebeeCody.)
11-18-2012 02:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: You are in charge of the next Pokemon Video Game - BumblebeeCody - 11-18-2012 02:24 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)