The Free Thread *gaming related*

[Psychospacecow]

(01-28-2013 10:06 PM)Mass Distraction Wrote:  

(01-28-2013 10:59 AM)Psychospacecow Wrote:  

(01-28-2013 05:43 AM)Mass Distraction Wrote:  

(01-28-2013 04:55 AM)A Zombie Riot Wrote:  

(01-28-2013 03:22 AM)SERIOUSLY THOUGH Wrote:  Someone's painstakingly taken the GTA:V screenshots and videos and synthesized them into a preliminary map

Spoiler (Click to View)

I would prefer the game to have the same map, but just with society advanced 20-odd years (between GTA: SA and GTA:V)

I have a feeling that, that map isn't the whole thing. Rockstar has said that GTA V's map is as big as IV, RDR AND San Andreas' maps COMBINED.

I personally find that complete and utter bullshit. San Andreas itself being bigger than San Andreas, Liberty City and two whole countries? I'd say that this is merely exaggerating on their part.

Well, it wasn't whole countries in red dead. It was mainly just the Texas, Mexico border if I'm not mistaken.

That would still be bigger than what I expect of a city, no matter how big it is.

I think Zombie Riot might be onto something with what he said.

It all really depends on the limitation of the consoles doesn't it?
Regardless, San Andreas was pretty big and all they'd have to do is include the further outlying lands and make the cities bigger. RDR was big, if you put it to scale, it probably covered 12th my state (and that is without working it out so take with a grain of salt), but V wouldn't necessarily be limited to California.