Hello There, Guest!  Login — Register

Did You Know Gaming? Forums / Gaming / Pokemon v / technically no
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
technically no
Author Message
Scormac Offline
Senior Member
****

Posts: 315
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 2
Thanks: 1
Given 30 thank(s) in 27 post(s)
Post: #15
RE: technically no
(08-02-2012 01:45 AM)SERIOUSLY THOUGH Wrote:  
(08-01-2012 11:07 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote:  @SERIOUSLY THOUGH
Oh dear[/font][/color]

MOW ROTOM !? SERIOUSLY !?

I swear now they're just picking random household objects and making them into Pokémon.
What next ? Vibratorox ? Teapotasaurusomon ?

Actually it is Rotom posessing the stuff
08-02-2012 01:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
technically no - zax1998 - 07-30-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: technically yes - BumblebeeCody - 07-30-2012, 09:52 PM
RE: technically no - Scormac - 07-30-2012, 10:07 PM
RE: technically no - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 07-30-2012, 11:19 PM
RE: technically no - zax1998 - 07-31-2012, 08:30 PM
RE: technically no - BumblebeeCody - 08-01-2012, 01:46 AM
RE: technically no - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 08-01-2012, 07:41 PM
RE: technically no - Raven - 08-01-2012, 02:38 AM
RE: technically no - BumblebeeCody - 08-01-2012, 09:23 AM
RE: technically no - Scormac - 08-01-2012, 10:42 AM
RE: technically no - BumblebeeCody - 08-01-2012, 11:07 PM
RE: technically no - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 08-02-2012, 01:45 AM
RE: technically no - Scormac - 08-02-2012 01:55 AM
RE: technically no - BumblebeeCody - 08-02-2012, 03:10 AM
RE: technically no - Nicknclank - 08-02-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: technically no - DarkNerd - 08-06-2012, 10:51 AM
RE: technically no - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 08-06-2012, 08:56 PM
RE: technically no - Scormac - 08-01-2012, 06:28 AM
RE: technically no - DarkNerd - 08-01-2012, 06:31 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Did You Know Gaming? | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication