MyBB Internal: One or more warnings occured. Please contact your administrator for assistance.
Did You Know Gaming? Forums - technically no

Did You Know Gaming? Forums

Full Version: technically no
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
technically rotom is not a legendary pokemon for he is able to breed with a ditto
i have 30 rotoms now and because other people do not know how to get him i am able to get good deals for him
Big GrinBig GrinBig Grin
I've never understood why people consider Rotom legendary. Is it because Rotom is near the legendary Pokemon in the Pokedex? I don't get it.
eh? who think's he's legendary then ? never heard of that before :o
Rotom... wtf I'm so behind on Pokémon nowadays
also fiona is not legendary but manaphy is even though she has a egg group manaphy does not come out of an egg bu fiona does so...
(07-31-2012 08:30 PM)zax1998 Wrote: [ -> ]also fiona is not legendary but manaphy is even though she has a egg group manaphy does not come out of an egg bu fiona does so...

Which I found odd. Also Rotom backwards is motoR which probably fitting since it evolves into kitchen appliances. No I am not fuckin' kidding it's that insanely stupid.
I fail to see whats so special about legendary pokemon anymore. There are 45 legendaries now. In my opinion, if they're all legendary, then none are legendary.
I never liked legendary pokemon anyways Tongue
(08-01-2012 02:38 AM)Raven Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see whats so special about legendary pokemon anymore. There are 45 legendaries now. In my opinion, if they're all legendary, then none are legendary.

I think they're legendary (high in amount sure) because of some sort of special presence that they have among the over Pocket Monsters. There are around 700(ish) Pokemon now so having 45(ish) legendaries isn't really that big.
(08-01-2012 09:23 AM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-01-2012 02:38 AM)Raven Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see whats so special about legendary pokemon anymore. There are 45 legendaries now. In my opinion, if they're all legendary, then none are legendary.

I think they're legendary (high in amount sure) because of some sort of special presence that they have among the over Pocket Monsters. There are around 700(ish) Pokemon now so having 45(ish) legendaries isn't really that big.

There are only 27 ghost typed pokemon :o
so there are more legendaries then ghost pokoemon
We should worship Gengar then.
The total is 649 Pokemon, 51 from 700.
(08-01-2012 01:46 AM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-31-2012 08:30 PM)zax1998 Wrote: [ -> ]also fiona is not legendary but manaphy is even though she has a egg group manaphy does not come out of an egg bu fiona does so...

Which I found odd. Also Rotom backwards is motoR which probably fitting since it evolves into kitchen appliances. No I am not fuckin' kidding it's that insanely stupid.

Oh lawd seriously !?
If that's what Pokémon is nowadays, I'm gonna quietly stick to my early-gen games and ignore all the ice-cream cone, trash-can and washing machine 'Pokémon'
(08-01-2012 10:42 AM)Scormac Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-01-2012 09:23 AM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-01-2012 02:38 AM)Raven Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see whats so special about legendary pokemon anymore. There are 45 legendaries now. In my opinion, if they're all legendary, then none are legendary.

I think they're legendary (high in amount sure) because of some sort of special presence that they have among the over Pocket Monsters. There are around 700(ish) Pokemon now so having 45(ish) legendaries isn't really that big.

There are only 27 ghost typed pokemon :o
so there are more legendaries then ghost pokoemon

Wow really? That's a DidYouKnowRight there ha.

@SERIOUSLY THOUGH
Oh dear
(08-01-2012 11:07 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: [ -> ]@SERIOUSLY THOUGH
Oh dear[/font][/color]

MOW ROTOM !? SERIOUSLY !?

I swear now they're just picking random household objects and making them into Pokémon.
What next ? Vibratorox ? Teapotasaurusomon ?
(08-02-2012 01:45 AM)SERIOUSLY THOUGH Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-01-2012 11:07 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: [ -> ]@SERIOUSLY THOUGH
Oh dear[/font][/color]

MOW ROTOM !? SERIOUSLY !?

I swear now they're just picking random household objects and making them into Pokémon.
What next ? Vibratorox ? Teapotasaurusomon ?

Actually it is Rotom posessing the stuff
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's