SERIOUSLY THOUGH
Solo Diver
     
Posts: 2,154
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 35
|
Explaining modern Pokémon games
So here's the thing - When I was younger, I played Pokémon for hours and hours on end. Completed Blue, and Gold. Then I played Diamond, and completed that, mildly confused as to why my Pidgey had to enter a beauty contest.
I've followed Pokémon from afar - shaking my head at ice-cream Pokémon whilst vehemently denying the fact that having a rat Pokémon called Rattata was pretty much the same level of originality - though haven't actually played a proper game in a long time.
What I'd like is a brief overview of changes that have occured over the times.
e.g. What the devil is IV/EV, nature, abilities, and so on and so forth ...?
Also, what do you dis/like about the changes ?
[spoiler]I will reverse-double-supersonic-ancestral-brunch-bitchslap anyone who says something like "omgzz00rdz 1st Gen wuz de Gr8T5t", "4.5st g3n iz fur babeiz", or "Do you even lift"[/spoiler]
|
|
10-29-2012 05:21 AM |
|
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
Symphony
I lack imagination
  
Posts: 107
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 3
|
RE: Explaining modern Pokémon games
(11-02-2012 10:58 PM)Ouberry_13 Wrote: (11-02-2012 10:29 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: It gives a much higher level of respect though. It's not just a kiddies game but a game about seriously strategical thinking.
Yea, but that level of meticulous thinking on the player's part is not really needed to enjoy the game, which is probably why some people, myself included, don't bother at all with all this EV/IV crap. It's something extra that you don't really need to use to play the game, and personally, I don't see it as something to show respect towards. If you do it, good on you, but I'm not gonna give you more respect just for spending more time fighting certain mons.
Once again that's true if you're not interested in the metagame or you just play with your friends. However, not caring about EVs and natures (screw IVs) competitively means you're going to have a huge (and I really mean huge) disadvantage over someone who cares. 50 points into a stat might not make any difference 'offline' or with friends, but hell you'll be needing them on the meta.
|
|
11-03-2012 12:16 AM |
|
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
BumblebeeCody
Super Moderator
     
Posts: 2,194
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 24
|
RE: Explaining modern Pokémon games
(11-03-2012 12:16 AM)Symphony Wrote: (11-02-2012 10:58 PM)Ouberry_13 Wrote: (11-02-2012 10:29 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: It gives a much higher level of respect though. It's not just a kiddies game but a game about seriously strategical thinking.
Yea, but that level of meticulous thinking on the player's part is not really needed to enjoy the game, which is probably why some people, myself included, don't bother at all with all this EV/IV crap. It's something extra that you don't really need to use to play the game, and personally, I don't see it as something to show respect towards. If you do it, good on you, but I'm not gonna give you more respect just for spending more time fighting certain mons.
Once again that's true if you're not interested in the metagame or you just play with your friends. However, not caring about EVs and natures (screw IVs) competitively means you're going to have a huge (and I really mean huge) disadvantage over someone who cares. 50 points into a stat might not make any difference 'offline' or with friends, but hell you'll be needing them on the meta.
Exactly my point. If you want to mess around and get your pocket monsters to 100 then there's nothing to stop you playing that way. But if you ever want to win competitively, then you'll have to join the learning curve.
|
|
11-03-2012 09:54 AM |
|
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}